That requires a PC that can run the game. Many people buy a console so they don't have to have a PC that can't run it.
Just because the UI is changed doesn't mean people will like playing with a controller. For people that want to play on their PS3 and with a mouse, there should be an option. Giving people a choice is ALWAYS better than forcing people to conform and it's not that hard to have both UI's available depending on what controller you want.
Don't you just love it when a person acts as though their opinion is fact.
The FACT is that some people like it better with a M+KB. To them, it DOESN'T feel better with a controller. Others prefer the controller. No one is right or wrong. The only people that are wrong are people like you that think it's one or the other.
Just give people the option. It's not that hard.
That was my biggest complaint for BF3. The commander was awesome but just needs to do more. I would love it if there was something similar to Natural Selection 2 where the commander could give orders and help in multiple ways but also upgrade things and abilities for his team. How well the team does helps the commander do his job. It's a symbiotic relationship. I would love that in a BF game.
I was pissed when they took the commander out of BF3. I just hope they don't stick it in there just to say they did it. They could do so much more with the commander than UAV's, supply drops, air strikes, and orders. Develop the commander and what they can do. Make them matter in a match but also make it so the commander feature can be turned on and off in servers for those that don't like it.
I loved "The Duke". The only thing I didn't like were the black and white buttons were a little hard to reach. The fit was absolutely perfect for a person with big hands though.
Which brings me to why I hated the PS controllers. That design was too small for my big hands. If I play with one for more than 30 minutes, my hands start to cramp. The analogue sticks aren't very precise and your thumb slips off them too easily as well.
The new...
Mirror's Edge 2 will happen, and when it does, it will sell well...that is, unless they do something to ruin it. The first game was very good. It just needed some options, variation, a little more/better gun play, etc.
Of that list though, ME2 is the game I want most.
How about bringing back the commander? I was pissed when I found out they left it out of BF3.
The story is a 10 but the gameplay is probably close to a 6 or 7 for me. There's absolutely nothing new or innovative about the gameplay. The original may have even been better due to having to research enemies to understand their weaknesses and using the corresponding power. The graphics engine is also starting to show its age. I have no idea how some people/places could give this a 10. That would mean it's perfect and it is not.
That's exactly what I'm going through now. The story seems good but the gameplay is VERY boring and repetitive. It's the same thing over and over again.
I want to finish it for the story but I'm not having fun doing it. I've already played this type of game before ("gunning enemies between tiny bits of story progression").
I think what you saw was one of those Eagle Eye converters or something similar. Those aren't the same. They use a translator and those are usually not very good. I've tried them. There's always some sort of lag or something that doesn't feel right.
What I was talking about is the PS3 will allow you to plug a mouse and KB into the USB ports on the front of the PS3 but that's only good if the game you play is formatted for that. Like I said, the only ...
Just about any M+KB will work with the PS3. The issue is whether the game will support it. The only game I know that supported it was Unreal Tournament 3.
I think what he's talking about is more similar to the PS3 Move. They use two wands that work off of electromagnetism instead of a camera.
http://www.webpronews.com/g...
I swear most console players don't understand just how accurate and fast a mouse or trackball is when compared to an analogue stick. MS actually did a study between the two and found that players with a mouse were so much more accurate and fast that even mediocre mouse players still dominated the very best analogue players- and this was with console players getting aim assist that PC players don't get.
Source: 4693d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment
It's because you said it would be exclusive to the next Xbox.
It's baseless and comes off as fanboyish.
I personally think that both are worn out. Not a fan of either one.
Now if they could only bring back the original cartoon as well.
You're forgetting the licencing fees that consoles charge. PC games don't have that. Console games will probably always cost more due to that reason...well, that and because more people play on consoles so game creators will be able to get more money from console players.
If they want to make it better, make it so humans can play as the Cops as well. Make it kinda like Left 4 Dead where 4 play on one side and 4 play for the other side. Just like the zombies in L4D, the cops can have different classes/types. One with a riot shield, one with tear gas, etc. I'm sure others could think of better examples. Those are just off the top of my head. That's what I initially thought the first game was going to be like.
I agree with you on art being more important but I'd say immersion is just as important as the art; at least to me it is.
I'd take something like the Oculus Rift with graphics from 3 years ago over some slightly better graphics that we'll see in the next gen.
Umm, am I missing something here? There's no article to read. It just says go get the latest issue of Edge magazine to read the article. I'm not finding a link to read it on that site.